MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412138955 · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1360214

Editorial

2014· editorial· es· W2412138955 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanta Medica · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal plant effects and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeremonyLibrary scienceOpening ceremonyEnvironmental ethicsClassicsArt historyHistoryArchaeologyPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The past year had a special significance for Planta Medica , since the journal celebrated its 60th anniversary. To mark this festive occasion, a special anniversary ceremony, hosted by Prof. Dr. Luc Pieters (Editor-in-Chief), Prof. Dr. Adolf Nahrstedt (Senior Editor) and Prof. Dr. Matthias Hamburger (Review Editor) was organized at the 2013 International Congress and Annual Meeting of the Society for Medicinal Plant and Natural Product Research (GA) in Münster, 1st – 5th of September 2013. This ceremony also provided the occasion to present the first Thieme Award for the Most Innovative Paper of the Year , to the research group headed by Dr. Susan Murch of the University of British Columbia (Canada) for their ground-breaking work on plant metabolomics [ 1 ]. The “Most Innovative Paper of the Year” will also be awarded in 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it