MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412205269 · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.4.1726

Development of Spontaneous Glycinergic Currents in the Mauthner Neuron of the Zebrafish Embryo

2000· article· en· W2412205269 on OpenAlexafffund
Declan W. Ali, Pierre Drapeau, Pascal Legendre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsInhibitory postsynaptic potentialPostsynaptic CurrentPostsynaptic potentialChemistryMauthner cellNeurosciencePatch clampSynaptogenesisBiophysicsEmbryoGlycine receptorElectrophysiologyExcitatory postsynaptic potentialGlycineBiologyCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used whole cell and outside-out patch-clamp techniques with reticulospinal Mauthner neurons of zebrafish embryos to investigate the developmental changes in the properties of glycinergic synaptic currents in vivo from the onset of synaptogenesis. Miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) were isolated and recorded in the presence of TTX (1 microM), kynurenic acid (1 mM), and bicuculline (10 microM) and were found to be sensitive to strychnine (1 microM). The mIPSCs were first observed in 26-29 h postfertilization (hpf) embryos at a very low frequency of approximately 0.04 Hz, which increased to approximately 0.5 Hz by 30-40 hpf, and was approximately 10 Hz in newly hatched (>50 hpf) larvae, indicating an accelerated increase in synaptic activity. At all embryonic stages, the amplitudes of the mIPSCs were variable but their means were similar ( approximately 100 pA), suggesting rapid formation of the postsynaptic matrix. The 20-80% rise times of mIPSCs in embryos were longer (0.6-1.2 ms) than in larvae (approximately 0.3 ms), likely due to slower diffusion of glycine at the younger, immature synapses. The mIPSCs decayed with biexponential (tau(off1) and tau(off2)) time courses with a half-width in 26-29 hpf embryos that was longer and more variable than in older embryos and larvae. In 26- to 29-hpf embryos, tau(off1) was approximately 15 ms and tau(off2) was approximately 60 ms, representing events of intermediate duration; but occasionally long mIPSCs were observed in some cells where tau(off1) was approximately 40 ms and tau(off2) was approximately 160 ms. In 30-40 hpf embryos, the events were faster, with tau(off1) approximately 9 ms and tau(off2) approximately 40 ms, and in larvae, events declined somewhat further to tau(off1) approximately 4 ms and tau(off2) approximately 30 ms. Point-per-point amplitude histograms of the decay of synaptic events at all stages resulted in the detection of similar single channel conductances estimated as approximately 45 pS, indicating the presence of heteromeric glycine receptors (GlyRs) from the onset of synaptogenesis. Fast-flow (1 ms) application of a saturating concentration of glycine (3-10 mM) to outside-out patches obtained at 26-29 hpf revealed GlyR currents that decayed biexponentially with time constants resembling the values found for intermediate and long mIPSCs; by 30-40 hpf, the GlyR currents resembled fast mIPSCs. These observations indicate that channel kinetics limited the mIPSC duration. Our data suggest that glycinergic mIPSCs result from the activation of a mixture of fast and slow GlyR subtypes, the properties and proportion of which determine the decay of the synaptic events in the embryos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207