MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412242617 · doi:10.33588/rn.3010.99365

La historia natural de la esclerosis múltiple

2000· article· es· W2412242617 on OpenAlexaff
Marcelo Kremenchutzky

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Neurología · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural historyMultiple sclerosisContext (archaeology)MedicineEpidemiologyDiseasePediatricsDermatologyPathologyImmunologyInternal medicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is one of the commonest idiopathic inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system in young adults. The study of the natural history of multiple sclerosis implies in the first place, establishing precise limits for the diagnosis of the disease, which is still of unknown origin. It is also necessary to analyze the wide range of varieties, which as different categories or subgroups and with different degrees of severity, make up the clinical spectrum of this entity. DEVELOPMENT AND CONCLUSIONS: Throughout this review benign and malignant multiple sclerosis, remitting and progressive forms, are studied from epidemiological and clinical points of view in the context of large populations of patients with multiple sclerosis on long-term follow up at a specialized centre, with the objective of finding, if possible, the patterns of the natural history of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de NeurologíaSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207