The effects of exposure to intense, 24 h light on the development of scoliosis in young chickens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aetiology of adolescent 5 coliosis remains unknown and hindering research is the absence of an appropriate animal model. It is now well-established that pinealectomy in young chickens results in the development of scoliosis that has many of the characteristics seen in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis but the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains elusive. The principle product of the pineal gland is melatonin and so many studies have focused on studying the effects of reduced levels of this hormone. The results have been mixed and the role of melatonin remains unclear. As melatonin production is inhibited by light, it was hypothesised that providing the chickens with an environment consisting of intense, continuous light would reduce serum melatonin levels and avoid any of the potential artifacts involved with the pinealectomy surgery. Consequently, pinealectomised and normal chickens were exposed to very intense light for complete 24 h in each day. At the end of 22 days in this environment serum melatonin levels had been reduced to very low levels in all chickens. Most importantly, 15% of the normal chickens had developed scoliosis and the number of pinealectomised chickens that developed scoliosis increased from 50% to 80%. The results showed that a method for reducing serum melatonin without pinealectomy has been established and which can be used in further experiments. Furthermore, the results also showed that reduced levels of serum melatonin has significant effects on the development of scoliosis. The indication is that there is a threshold level of serum melatonin below which scoliosis may develop probably in conjunction with some other factor which has yet to be identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".