Le devenir paysager. De quelques paysages postindustriels entre arts visuels et poésie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une réflexion sur le concept de paysage dans les arts visuels et la poésie québécoise contemporaine. Une brève archéologie du paysage permet de souligner ses origines picturales ainsi que l’anthropocentrisme dont il procède. En effet, lors de son émergence à la Renaissance, on considère que le sujet préexiste au paysage qui n’est que l’une de ses représentations du réel, auquel il donne forme. L’étude de plusieurs séries photographiques et vidéos d’Isabelle Hayeur et de quelques recueils de poèmes publiés depuis 2000 par Pierre Nepveu, Louis-Jean Thibault, Robert Melançon et Claude Paradis permet de montrer la prégnance du paysage dans les arts aujourd’hui. Si la subjectivité demeure centrale dans leurs représentations paysagères, celles-ci proposent d’autres perspectives d’analyse. Plus que simple motif esthétique ou cliché touristique, le paysage est en voie de devenir un lieu de rencontre, de convergence éthique et esthétique. Quelles peuvent donc être alors les nouvelles relations entre paysage et subjectivité?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".