Quand la « branche » s’autonomise de l’arbre : le cas de la littérature canadienne-française (1934-1948)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When the limb branches away from the tree: the case of French-Canadian literature (1934-1948) Robert Charbonneau, director of La Nouvelle Releve, journalist and writer, at the end of the Second World War, faces off with, to his dismay, many renown French authors, triggering a real quarrel. The various assertions of Parisian intellectuals encourage the editor of L’Arbre (The Tree) to start a work of resistance. With traces of refusal and insubordination, his articles address the literary issue from the practical, concrete and policy points of view, taking into consideration the editorial apparatus in its entirety. The man thus resists atypically because he defends the creation of the authors of his country, by adopting the concept of the Americanism of their origin. By his actions, he demonstrates that the French-Canadian production has a double culture: educational francization and de facto Americanism, putting aside the colonial conception of culture and cultural supremacy of France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".