MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412413050 · doi:10.1038/srep21336

Histone acetyltransferease p300 modulates TIM4 expression in dendritic cells

2016· article· en· W2412413050 on OpenAlexafffund
Bo Yang, Lin-Jing Li, Lingzhi Xu, Jiang‐Qi Liu, Huanping Zhang, Xiao‐Rui Geng, Ping‐Chang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicGalectins and Cancer Biology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChromatin immunoprecipitationBiologyCell biologyChromatinMolecular biologyGene expressionPromoterGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TIM4 (T cell immunoglobulin mucin domain molecule-4) plays a critical role in the initiation of skewed T helper (Th) 2 polarization. The factors regulating TIM4 expression are unclear. This study tests a hypothesis that p300 and STAT6 (signal transducer and activator transcription-6) regulates TIM4 expression in dendritic cells (DC). In this study, a food allergy mouse model was developed with ovalbumin (a specific antigen) and cholera toxin (CT; an adjuvant). The chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was performed to evaluate the chromatin changes at TIM4 and STAT6 promoters. The TIM4 expression was evaluated by real time RT-PCR and Western blotting. The results showed that high levels of p300 and TIM4 were detected in the intestinal DCs of mice with intestinal allergy. p300 is involved in the CT-induced TIM4 expression in DCs. p300 interacts with the chromatin at the TIM4 promoter locus in DCs isolated from allergic mice. CT increases p300 expression to regulate STAT6 levels in DCs. STAT6 mediates the CT-induced TIM4 expression in DCs. In conclusion, p300 and STAT6 mediate the microbial product CT-induced TIM4 expression in DCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicGalectins and Cancer BiologyFrench-language works237,207