Pi-Extended Ethynyl 21,23-Dithiaporphyrins: A Synthesis and Comparative Study of Electrochemical, Optical, and Self-Assembling Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
21,23-Dithiaporphyrins were synthesized containing pi-extending ethynyl substituents at the meso positions. These porphyrins displayed highly bathochromic and broadened absorbance profiles spanning 400-900 nm with molar absorptivities ranging from 2500 to 300,000 M(-1) cm(-1). Electrochemically, these ethynyl dithiaporphyrins undergo a single oxidation at 0.44 or 0.57 V and reduction at -1.17 or -1.08 V versus a ferrocene/ferrocenium internal standard depending on the type of functionalization appended to the ethynyl group. DFT calculations predict that the delocalization of the frontier molecular orbitals should expand onto the meso positions of the ethynyl 21,23-dithiaporphyrins; shrinking the HOMO-LUMO energy gap by destabilizing the HOMO energy. Indeed, the DFT results agree with our optical and electrochemical assessments. Finally, differential scanning calorimetry combined with cross-polarized optical microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction was used to assess the ability of these porphyrins for long-range order. For the ethynylphenyl alkoxy 21,23-dithiaporphyin, birefringent, soft-crystalline-like domains were observed by polarized microscopy, which are marginally sustained by a low-level of crystallinity detected in the XRD, suggesting that long-range ordering is possible. Overall, ethynyl 21,23-dithiaporphyrins are able to harvest much lower energy light and possess lower oxidation and reduction potentials compared to their pyrrolic analogues, which are desirable properties for applications in organic electronics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".