MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412455509

[Photodynamic therapy as a new prospective method for cancer treatment--II. Overview of photosensitizers].

2004· article· en· W2412455509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petr Zimčík, Miroslav Miletín

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodynamic therapyVerteporfinPhotosensitivityClinical trialMedicineDermatologyPharmacokineticsCancerClinical PracticeMedical physicsInternal medicineMacular degenerationChemistryMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOphthalmology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the time when hematoporphyrine derivative (trade name Photofrin) has been introduced into clinical practice in Canada in 1993, a lot of new photosensitizers (PS) have been studied. Some of them successfully passed the clinical trials and are in use in the treatment of cancerous (ALA, temoporfin) and non-cancerous (verteporfin) diseases. The others (motexafin lutecium, talaporfin, phthalocyanines and SnET2) are entering or passing the clinical trials now. The newer PS are also called the second generation PS, when the first generation is composed of Photofrin only. The second generation PS usually possesses better properties, especially concerning absorption at longer wavelengths, shorter skin photosensitivity, better accumulation ratio between tumorous and healthy tissue and pharmacokinetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207