MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single and Double Beta-Decay<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math>Values among the Triplet<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Zr</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>, and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Mo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2016· article· lv· W2412466670 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Alanssari, D. Frekers, T. Eronen, L. Cañete, J. Dilling, M. Haaranen, J. Hakala, M. Holl, M. Jes̆kovský, A. Jokinen, A. Kankainen, J. Koponen, A. Mayer, I. D. Moore, D. A. Nesterenko, I. Pohjalainen, Pavel P. Povinec, J. Reinikainen, S. Rinta-Antila, P. C. Srivastava, J. Suhonen, R. I. Thompson, A. Voss, Michael E. Wieser

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAcademy of FinlandMinistry of Higher Education and Scientific ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAl-Nahrain University
KeywordsPhysicsDouble beta decayBeta decayCoupling constantQuenching (fluorescence)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsNuclear physicsNeutrinoParticle physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistryFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The atomic mass relations among the mass triplet $^{96}\mathrm{Zr}$, $^{96}\mathrm{Nb}$, and $^{96}\mathrm{Mo}$ have been determined by means of high-precision mass measurements using the JYFLTRAP mass spectrometer at the IGISOL facility of the University of Jyv\"askyl\"a. We report $Q$ values for the $^{96}\mathrm{Zr}$ single and double $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decays to $^{96}\mathrm{Nb}$ and $^{96}\mathrm{Mo}$, as well as the $Q$ value for the $^{96}\mathrm{Nb}$ single $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay to $^{96}\mathrm{Mo}$, which are ${Q}_{\ensuremath{\beta}}(^{96}\mathrm{Zr})=163.96(13)$, ${Q}_{\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}}(^{96}\mathrm{Zr})=3356.097(86)$, and ${Q}_{\ensuremath{\beta}}(^{96}\mathrm{Nb})=3192.05(16)\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$. Of special importance is the $^{96}\mathrm{Zr}$ single $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay $Q$ value, which has never been determined directly. The single $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay, whose main branch is fourfold unique forbidden, is an alternative decay path to the $^{96}\mathrm{Zr}$ $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay, and its observation can provide one of the most direct tests of the neutrinoless $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay nuclear-matrix-element calculations, as these can be simultaneously performed for both decay paths with no further assumptions. The theoretical single $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay rate has been re-evaluated using a shell-model approach, which indicates a $^{96}\mathrm{Zr}$ single $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay lifetime within reach of an experimental verification. The uniqueness of the decay also makes such an experiment interesting for an investigation into the origin of the quenching of the axial-vector coupling constant ${g}_{A}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2580.229

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207