MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412468058 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100052884

Sarcoidosis Presenting as an Intramedullary Spinal Cord Lesion

2001· review· en· W2412468058 on OpenAlexaffvenue
F. B. Maroun, Frank O’Dea, G. Mathieson, G. Fox, Gerald P. Murray, Jerry Jacob, Rekha Reddy, R. J. Avery

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Canadian institutionsSt. John’s Health Sciences CentreHealth Sciences CentreMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSarcoidosisSpinal cordIntramedullary rodPresentation (obstetrics)BiopsyPathologicalLesionCordGranulomaSurgeryRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Sarcoidosis affects the spinal cord in only 0.43% of patients with sarcoidosis. Usually there is systemic involvement prior to the development of cord lesions. We present a case of sarcoid isolated to the intramedullary spinal cord, which was a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We review the case and then present a review of the literature with an emphasis on presentation, diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We have reviewed a patient who presented with an isolated sarcoid granuloma affecting the cervical spinal cord. All pertinent history and physical information was extracted from the patient's chart and through patient interview. Laboratory, radiographic and pathological investigations are presented. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen patients have been reported with isolated intramedullary spinal cord sarcoidosis. Current practice supports the role of surgery for biopsy; mainstay of treatment is corticosteroids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207