MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412516660 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-294-5:41

Derivatization of Carbohydrates

2003· article· en· W2412516660 on OpenAlexaff
Shigeo Suzuki, John F. Kelly, Steven J. Locke, Pierre Thibault, Susumu Honda

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsCaprion (Canada)National Research Council CanadaInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonosaccharideHemiacetalChemistryDerivatizationHydroxymethylPolysaccharideOrganic chemistrySugarStereochemistryChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The monosaccharides comprise a number of isomers and homologues having very similar structures, basically composed of hydroxymethyl or hydroxymethine groups linked to each other. In reducing monosaccharides the hemiacetal group is at the reducing ends in addition to these polyhydroxylated basal structures. There are other series of monosaccharides with the ketal or carboxyl group instead of or in addition to the hemiacetal group. Substitution of the hydroxyl group by the hydrogen atom or the amino group produces the deoxy sugar or the amino sugar, respectively. All these functional groups give monosaccharides hydrophilic properties. With the exception of monosaccharide residues containing a carboxyl group, detection of these compounds following chromatographic and electrophoretic separation is rendered difficult owing to their inherent lack of chromophores in the ultraviolet (UV) and visible spectrum regions. Obviously, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides composed of these monosaccharide units have a similar shortcoming with respect to their detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207