MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2412605424

[Type A/H1N1 influenza: a clinical summary of 24 imported cases].

2009· article· en· W2412605424 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Wang, Fengxin Chen, Ming Zhang, Liang Wu

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSore throatMedicineDiarrheaEtiologyInternal medicinePneumoniaNasal dischargeGastroenterologyNasal congestionSurgeryNose
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical characteristics and laboratory results of 24 confirmed H1N1 influenza cases. METHODS: The characters of clinical, laboratory, iconography and etiology of 24 patients with A/H1N1 were studied, and the changes of T-lymphocyte subsets that between the pre- and post-treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: The ages of patients were ranged from 6 to 65 years old; average age was 26 years old.15 patients were under 25 years old. 22 (22/24, 91.7%) patients had recently traveled to USA or Canada. The most common presenting symptoms were: fever (22/24, 91.7%); sore throat (22/24, 91.7%); cough (20/24, 83.3%); dry cough (14/24, 58.3%); expectoration (6/24, 25.0%); nasal discharge (6/24, 25.0%). Six had pneumonia in sixteen patients (6/16, 37.5%) who took CT scan; seven (7/24, 29.2%) had headache and four (4/24, 16.7%) had muscular soreness; two (2/24, 8.3%) had sneeze and nasal obstruction; only one(1/24, 4.2%) had diarrhea; one (1/24, 4.2%) had conjunctivitis. The result of 23 patients about T-Lymphocyte subsets: most of CD4 and CD8 were decreased (18/23, 78.3%), ranging from 122 to 691 cells/microl (normal was 706 - 1125 cells/microl), with the average of 408 cells/microl, but ratios of CD4/CD8 were normal. Fourteen patients were detected CD4 and CD8 after received the treatment during 5 to 7 days.the results of CD4 (cells/microl) were different between the pre- and post-treatment: 436.29 +/- 189.06, 976.71 +/- 332.96 (paired-samples t test: t = -5.416, P < 0.05) while the results of CD8 (cells/microl) were: 323.64 +/- 176.47, 703.14 +/- 211.77 (t = -5.319, P < 0.05); the results of leukocytes in 22 patients were different between pre- and post-treatment: (5.13 +/- 1.47) x 10(9)/L, (6.25 +/- 1.37) x 10(9)/L (t = -2.900, P < 0.05) while the results of lymphocytes were: (1.16 +/- 0.43) x 10(9)/L, (2.30 +/- 0.37) x 10(9)/L (t = -6.819, P < 0.05); but the ratios of CD4/CD8 were: 1.44 +/- 0.41, 1.40 +/- 0.26 (t = 0.507, P > 0.05). All the patients were received antivirus treatment (Oseltamivir) and the virus conversed during 1 - 10 days (average 4.5 days). The temperature was normal after onset during 3 - 4 days and the patients were recovered during 3 - 13 days (with the average of 7.3 days). CONCLUSION: Influenza A virus H1N1 subtype was identified as the cause of outbreaks of febrile respiratory infection which was self-limited. There was no evidence to show that the changes of T-Lymphocyte subsets could indicate the prognosis of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→