MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412691851 · doi:10.5858/2005-129-157-socgra

Seventh O.E.S.O. Congress: Gastroesophageal Reflux and Barrett Esophagus

2005· article· en· W2412691851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gregorio Chejfec, Henry D. Appelman

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEsophagusGeneral surgeryLibrary scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On September 3, 2003, a group of distinguished pathologists and clinicians gathered at the most recent meeting of the Congress of the O.E.S.O. in Paris, France. This issue of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine includes the lectures given by each of the presenters at this meeting.O.E.S.O. are the initials for the Organisation mondiale d'Etudes Sp;aaecialis;aaees sur les maladies de l'Oesophage, a French association dedicated to study of the esophagus. The English equivalent is World Organization for Specialized Studies on Diseases of the Esophagus. The initials of the French name are also the first 4 letters in the European spelling for the first part of the digestive tract, the oesophagus, so the acronym is very appropriate. This association was established in the late 1970s by an innovative French esophageal surgeon, Robert Giuli, who is still its guiding light. Dr Giuli had the foresight to recognize the need for bringing together physicians and scientists of many disciplines to exchange information on normal functions and diseases of the esophagus. He organized the first international O.E.S.O. Congress in Paris in 1984, and subsequent Congresses have been held in Paris in 1987, 1990, 1993, 1996, 2000, and 2003. These Congresses have brought together surgeons, gastroenterologists, pediatricians, radiologists, epidemiologists, pathologists, pharmacologists, biochemists, anatomists, and physiologists to discuss the most recent advances in esophageal disorders. The proceedings of each of these Congresses have been published as books, which are virtual encyclopedias of esophageal form and function, both normal and abnormal. The Congresses have become venues for pathologists to rub elbows with a variety of clinicians, and the pathologists feel welcomed and comfortable and are valuable contributors to this multidisciplinary activity. Pathologists who have been active participants and planners in these Congresses, many of whom are the most esteemed gastrointestinal pathologists in the world, include (from North America) Don Antonioli, Henry Appelman, Parakrama Chandrasoma, Greg Chejfec, Palayo Correa, Kim Geisinger, John Goldblum, Rodger Haggitt, Stanley Hamilton, Jeff Lee, Klaus Lewin, Liz Montgomery, Rob Adze, Bob Riddell, and Mamoun Younes. From Europe, the United Kingdom, and Japan, past participants and planners include Wladimir Bogomoletz, Mike Dixon, Nadine Ectors, Jean-Fran;alcois Flejou, Annie Galian, Daniel Gardiol, Bob Genta, Karel Geboes, David Hopwood, Francois Potet, Neil Shepherd, Pentti Sipponen, Manfred Stolte, Kaiyo Takubo, Elizabeth Tschanz, and Michael Veith. In 4 of the past 6 Congresses, there have been symposia, ranging from 2 to 4 hours, devoted to the pathology of the esophagus, and many of the pathologists listed above have given lectures during these symposia.The theme of the 2003 pathology symposium was metaplasia of the esophageal mucosa, whereby the squamous epithelium is replaced by mucosa lined with columnar epithelium and containing mucus-producing goblet cells. This condition is hereinafter referred to as Barrett metaplasia in honor of Norman Barrett, whose pioneer work first attracted the attention of investigators in this field.The initial lectures at the 2003 symposium were devoted to gastroesophageal reflux disease, ultimately associated with the development of Barrett metaplasia. In keeping with previous O.E.S.O. meetings, each one of the presentations was a response to a specific question. Kaiyo Takubo (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology) answered the first question: “Is there a set of histologic changes that are invariably reflux associated?” The second question, “Has a histologic transition from GERD-damaged epithelium to columnar metaplasia ever been seen in humans?” was discussed by Robert Riddell (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario).Following these introductory discussions, attention was concentrated on the neoplastic potential of the metaplastic mucosa. The subject of dysplasia was the center of attention.Appropriately, Henry Appelman (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) opened this portion of the symposium with an eloquent dissertation, “What is dysplasia?” Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of dysplasia was thoroughly analyzed by Elizabeth Montgomery (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Md).The wide variation in the incidence of adenocarcinomas associated with Barrett metaplasia was addressed by Elizabeth R. Tschanz (Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva) in collaboration with Robert Genta (Geneva).The features distinguishing adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction from Barrett adenocarcinoma were discussed by Nadine Ectors (University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). The final presentation was by Mamoun Younes (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex), who discussed the role of cytokeratins in the identification of the mucosa of the gastric cardia and Barrett metaplastic mucosa.The Archives is pleased to reproduce the text of the 2003 O.E.S.O. presentations. We hope our readers will benefit from the experience of these well-known investigators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineSame topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207