Il tema della conformità con la Volontà divina nel periodo moderno. Una nuova generazione di moralisti nel XVIº secolo. L’influsso dell’ockhamismo e nuove proposte per la teologia morale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: In this article one is brought through the thought of the moral theologians from the 16th century to St. Alphonsus Liguori, an illustrious representative of the 18th century. During these three centuries the Manualistic School was very much present with its interests and its particular structure having been well defined in the Council of Trent. The Manualistic School put forward an understanding of moral theology in such a way that reduced the scope of moral issues, leading to various shortcomings. One of these was the moving of certain moral issues previously dealt with in moral theology, strictly to the realm of spiritual or pastoral theology. A concrete example of this moving of moral issues to another realm of theology was the conformity of the human will with the Will of God. This theme no longer appeared in the manuals of moral theology as it was a topic that evaded the perspective of the Manualistic School, which was, instead, a growing and demanding vision of moral obligation, leading to moral legalism. Key words: Manualistic School, legalism, conformity, God's Will, the Will of the Father, obedience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".