MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412814069 · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_19

Density Gradient Separation of Sperm for Artificial Insemination

2012· article· en· W2412814069 on OpenAlexaff
David Mortimer, Sharon T. Mortimer

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsAchieve Life Sciences (Canada)BC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermArtificial inseminationSemenInseminationDifferential centrifugationRobustness (evolution)Density gradientSperm washingAndrologyBiologyMedicineMolecular biologyGeneticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human spermatozoa for clinical procedures such as IUI or IVF, or for diagnostic or research studies of sperm fertilizing ability, must be separated from the seminal plasma environment not only as soon as possible after ejaculation but also as efficiently as possible, minimizing seminal plasma and bacterial carryover. Furthermore, in addition to technical simplicity and robustness, a sperm preparation method needs to select not just the more motile and morphologically normal spermatozoa but also those spermatozoa with reduced DNA damage. Currently the most effective and efficient technique for this is density gradient centrifugation, which has been extensively validated through research and clinical application. An optimized protocol based on silane-coated colloidal silica products is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207