MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412904597 · doi:10.1186/s12992-016-0170-z

Towards sustainable partnerships in global health: the case of the CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases in Peru

2016· review· en· W2412904597 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. Jaime Miranda, Antonio Bernabé‐Ortiz, Francisco Diez‐Canseco, Germán Málaga, María Kathia Cárdenas, Rodrigo M. Carrillo‐Larco, María Lazo-Porras, Miguel Moscoso‐Porras, M. Amalia Pesantes, Vilarmina Ponce-Lucero, Ricardo Araya, David Beran, Peter Busse, Oscar Boggio, William Checkley, Patricia García, Luis Huicho, Fabiola Lèon‐Velarde, Andrés G. Lescano, David C. Mohr, William Pan, David Peiris, Pablo Perel, Cristina Rabadan‐Diehl, Maria C. Rivera, Katherine A. Sacksteder, Liam Smeeth, Antonio J. Trujillo, Jonathan C. K. Wells, Lijing L. Yan, Héctor H. Garcı́a, Robert H. Gilman

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobalization and Health · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFogarty International CenterNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteMedical Research CouncilAlliance for Health Policy and Systems ResearchInter-American Institute for Global Change ResearchConsejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación TecnológicaNational Science FoundationWellcomeGrand Challenges CanadaNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaWellcome TrustConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsExcellenceGeneral partnershipPolitical sciencePublic relationsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human capital requires opportunities to develop and capacity to overcome challenges, together with an enabling environment that fosters critical and disruptive innovation. Exploring such features is necessary to establish the foundation of solid long-term partnerships. In this paper we describe the experience of the CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, based at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia in Lima, Peru, as a case study for fostering meaningful and sustainable partnerships for international collaborative research. The CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases was established in 2009 with the following Mission: "We support the development of young researchers and collaboration with national and international institutions. Our motivation is to improve population's health through high quality research." The Centre's identity is embedded in its core values - generosity, innovation, integrity, and quality- and its trajectory is a result of various interactions between multiple individuals, collaborators, teams, and institutions, which together with the challenges confronted, enables us to make an objective assessment of the partnership we would like to pursue, nurture and support. We do not intend to provide a single example of a successful partnership, but in contrast, to highlight what can be translated into opportunities to be faced by research groups based in low- and middle-income countries, and how these encounters can provide a strong platform for fruitful and sustainable partnerships. In defiant contexts, partnerships require to be nurtured and sustained. Acknowledging that all partnerships are not and should not be the same, we also need to learn from the evolution of such relationships, its key successes, hurdles and failures to contribute to the promotion of a culture of global solidarity where mutual goals, mutual gains, as well as mutual responsibilities are the norm. In so doing, we will all contribute to instil a new culture where expectations, roles and interactions among individuals and their teams are horizontal, the true nature of partnerships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobalization and HealthSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207