MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412913260 · doi:10.4244/eijy15m11_03

Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Lotus valve: first-in-man experience

2016· article· en· W2412913260 on OpenAlexaff
Vinnie Bapat, Kaleab Asrress, Ricardo Boix, Zhan Yun Lim, Jane Hancock, Simon Redwood

Bibliographic record

VenueEuroIntervention · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMedicineStenosisHeart valveComplicationCardiologySurgeryHeart diseaseInternal medicineValve replacementAortic valve stenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: To demonstrate the feasibility of implanting the Lotus second-generation transcatheter heart valve (THV) (designed for a transfemoral procedure) via a transaortic approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: We describe a case with severe aortic stenosis in the presence of small calibre and calcified femoral access and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The transaortic approach was the ideal approach for this patient and we successfully implanted a 25 mm Lotus valve without any complication. CONCLUSIONS: The transaortic access is a feasible and safe alternative in patients who have suboptimal iliofemoral conduits and who will benefit from the unique features of the Lotus THV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuroInterventionSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207