A Quality Adaptive Multimodal Affect Recognition System for User-Centric Multimedia Indexing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent increase in interest for online multimedia streaming platforms has availed massive amounts of multimedia information that need to be indexed to be searchable and retrievable. User-centric implicit affective indexing employing emotion detection based on psycho-physiological signals, such as electrocardiography (ECG), galvanic skin response (GSR), electroencephalography (EEG) and face tracking, has recently gained attention. However, real world psycho-physiological signals obtained from wearable devices and facial trackers are contaminated by various noise sources that can result in spurious emotion detection. Therefore, in this paper we propose the development of psycho-physiological signal quality estimators for unimodal affect recognition systems. The presented systems perform adequately in classifying users affect however, they resulted in high failure rates due to rejection of bad quality samples. Thus, to reduce the affect recognition failure rate, a quality adaptive multimodal fusion scheme is proposed. The proposed scheme yields no failure, while at the same time classify the users' arousal/valence and liking with significantly above chance weighted F1-scores in a cross-user experiment. Another finding of this study is that head movements encode liking perception of users in response to music snippets. This work also includes the release of the employed dataset including psycho-physiological signals, their quality annotations, and users' affective self-assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".