MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412984041 · doi:10.7748/ns.17.35.25.s38

Right to relief

2003· article· en· W2412984041 on OpenAlexaff
John Gristwood

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Standard · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic painRheumatoid arthritisDistressMedicinePsychiatryPain reliefPhysical therapyPain catastrophizingPsychological distressClinical psychologySurgeryInternal medicineAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic pain is one of the most common reasons why people seek medical care. It can have an overwhelming effect on a patient’s life and can cause distress and disability. Alice, a community client who is 94, suffers from chronic pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis. She has had this pain for 30 years. Chronic pain – pain that has lasted for at least three months – is usually accompanied by behavioural change. Alice is depressed, and while some days she is bright, the pain ‘eats away’ at her spirit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3150.185

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.406 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing StandardSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207