MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413010264

[Experiencing pregnancy with human papillomavirus: a case study].

2007· article· en· W2413010264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Albertína Rocha Diógenes, Maria Grasiela Teixeira Barroso

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWomen's cancer prevention and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman papillomavirusPregnancyGynecologyContact tracingMedicineObstetricsFamily medicinePsychologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BiologyPathologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a case study which theoretical reference is the Calgary Model of Family Evaluation (CMFE). The aim was to understand the experience of a pregnant woman with vulvar condilomatosis caused by Human Papillomavirus (HPV), and to understand the changes in family dynamics after the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of HPV. The study was conducted at a reference institution in gynecology in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. Data were collected fiom October 2003 through April 2004. Data were analyzed using CMFE, tracing six "developing" events, highlighting that the patient experienced emotional suffering caused by pregnancy and by HPV, as well as physical suffering, due to the surgeries to which she was submitted to. All these facts altered family dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicWomen's cancer prevention and managementFrench-language works237,207