MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413035023

El poder de la evaluación para el aprendizaje

2016· article· es· W2413035023 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anita Sherwin – Hamer

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), a traves de su Facultad de Educacion, organizo el Congreso Internacional de Educadores UPC 2016 - “Innovacion en la Educacion”. Este importante evento que se realizo los dias 2, 3 y 4 de febrero en el Centro Convenciones del Colegio Medico del Peru y en el Campus Villa de la UPC, conto con la participacion de un distinguido grupo de 9 expositores internacionales provenientes de paises como Estados Unidos, Espana, Australia, Canada y Alemania, y 20 destacados especialistas nacionales quienes compartieron su conocimiento a traves de Conferencias Magistrales y Paneles de expertos. http://bit.ly/1T6hIiN

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.088
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.124
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0880.124
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.012
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)Same topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207