The Effects of Combined Insulin and Metformin Therapy in Obese Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in the Early Stage of the Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In General Hospital setting, where varieties of patients are included in neurorehabilitation process, set of multidisciplinary functional tests were established, as a routine in daily work. Tests were done by physiotherapists and occupational therapists who were members of rehabilitation team. Our aim was to select the tests which can be used as a routine and are applicable for different neurological impairments in daily work. Tests were applied to inpatients admitted to the Medical, Trauma, Neurology and Neurosurgery wards in the Rashid Hospital, DOHMS, Dubai. Fifty inpatients with different neurological impairments admitted to totally 8 wards, were tested in the beginning of rehabilitation process and on discharge from the hospital. Nine tests were used as standardized tests for measuring motor, cognitive, focal impairment, ADL activities and disability: Motricity Index, Trunk Control Test, Standing Balance score, Functional Ambulation Categories test, Mini Mental State Examination, Canadian Neurological Scale, Action Research Arm test, Bartel Index and Functional Independent Measurements. FIM, Motricity Index and Trunk Control Test were applicable for all tested patients, with required adaptation for different neurological conditions within the same score. Other tests were not applicable for all patients as routine, but there were very useful for certain number of patients as a measurement of functional improvement. It is very important to have proper setup of tests, which are simple, reliable and valid for measuring impairment, disability and handicap and which can be used as standardized part of assessment protocol. Also, they must be applicable for different neurological impairments to monitor treatment progress. Combination of tests performed by different professionals and comprehensive approach of all team members is very important for measuring outcomes in rehabilitation and evaluating patient's impairment and disability. Proper hospital setup, optimal number of staff, good communication and team work are leading to better outcome in neurorehabilitation process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".