MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413131005 · doi:10.1109/plans.2016.7479679

Partide swarm optimization algorithm in calibration of MEMS-based low-cost magnetometer

2016· article· en· W2413131005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetometerParticle swarm optimizationCalibrationComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemHeading (navigation)Robustness (evolution)Attitude and heading reference systemInertial navigation systemAlgorithmInertial measurement unitControl theory (sociology)Orientation (vector space)EngineeringComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMagnetic fieldMathematicsAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In land platform navigation, many systems as Global Positioning System (GPS) and Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) are used to get the position and the orientation solutions. Magnetometers are complementary sensors used in the navigation algorithms to achieve heading information based on utilizing Attitude and Heading Reference System (AHRS) model. However, low-cost magnetometers decrease the precision of the navigation system due to their inherent errors. Thus, a calibration process should be conducted as a first step to compensate the deterministic errors. This paper proposes a method to calibrate a three-axis magnetometer using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm and the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model. The improved PSO represents the main contribution of the proposed method, which allows the determination of the calibration parameters for each magnetometer data, and the IGRF model is used to determine the true total Earth's Magnetic Field (EMF) in each time step. In this work, we compare the precision of the standard PSO against the proposed method which provides higher robustness by achieving a better compensation of the errors effects (hard and soft iron, etc.). Since the hard and soft iron are the most significant errors in a Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) based low-cost magnetometers, the proposed method aims to compensate these errors with a minimal error relative to the reference EMF. Several tests have been made to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. The raw measurements of a MEMS-based on the low-cost magnetometer have been collected in Montreal (Canada) using a real car in different environments (under high-voltage lines, city center, highway, tunnel, etc.) full of distortion sources for the magnetic field. The proposed method always gets a better accuracy and precision even in a harsh environment for a low-cost magnetometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207