MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413153950

Evaluation of the effect of Lake Hévíz thermal mineral water in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, controlled, single-blind, follow-up study.

2014· article· en· W2413153950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisWOMACBalneotherapyPhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialVisual analogue scaleRheumatologyQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is the most frequent joint disease and is a leading cause of pain and locomotor disability in elderly people. The treatment of osteoarthritis includes non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical therapies. Silver level evidence has been found concerning balneotherapy in osteoarthritis. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate how Lake Hévíz thermal mineral water therapy influences pain, knee function, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis, compared to the control group. STUDY DESIGN: randomized, controlled, single-blind, follow-up study. SETTING: Spa Hévíz and St. Andrew Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases POPULATION: This study included 77 outpatients between 45 and 75 years of age with mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee meeting the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. METHODS: Patients were randomized into two groups. In group I (n = 38), subjects bathed in Lake Hévíz and in group II (N.=39), patients were treated in a pool full of tap water. Water temperature was 34 °C for both groups. Participants underwent 30-minute therapy sessions, five times a week for three weeks. Outcome measures were pain visual analogue scale scores, active flexion degree, knee circumference, stair-climb time, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire score (EQ-5D). Study parameters were recorded at baseline, immediately after treatment, and after 15 weeks. RESULTS: Comparison of the two groups revealed a statistically significant difference in pain visual analogue scale scores (P<0.01), active flexion degree (P<0.01), physical function components of WOMAC (P<0.05), and EQ-5D scores (P<0.05) even after 15 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Balneotherapy improved pain, function as well as the quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Balneotherapy is a potentially useful treatment modality for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it