MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413160354 · doi:10.1149/1.2968110

Effect of Annealing on Sn[sub 30]Co[sub 30]C[sub 40] Prepared by Mechanical Attriting

2008· article· en· W2413160354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)DiffractionAmorphous solidCrystallizationElectrochemistryX-ray crystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Amorphous metalCrystallographyComposite materialChemical engineeringElectrodeOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Samples of prepared by vertical-axis attriting were annealed at different temperatures up to . The effects of annealing were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and by electrochemical testing. The XRD pattern of the as-milled sample shows an amorphous-like diffraction pattern. Crystallization of the occurs as evidenced by the appearance of Bragg peaks of crystalline CoSn in the diffraction pattern of the sample annealed at . Samples annealed above show only Bragg peaks of crystalline CoSn and no amorphous or nanostructured components. Electrochemical results show a significant decrease in first cycle reversible capacity from room temperature to the sample annealed at . The decrease in capacity can be related to the poor electrochemical performance of crystalline CoSn and to the increase in size of the CoSn grains in the carbon matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it