MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413288706

L’apologetica in "Epilogo" di Hans Urs von Balthasar

2011· article· de· W2413288706 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jesús Villagrasa Lc

Bibliographic record

VenueAlpha Omegan · 2011
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApologeticsPhilosophyPresentation (obstetrics)TheologyEpistemologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After establishing von Balthasar’s place in twentieth-century fundamental theology, the article presents the general outlines of his wor and, therefore, to some degree, his apologetics. This is done by explaining some structural features of three brief works: Razing the Bastions: On the Church in this Age (1952) which constitutes the pars destruens and clears the basis on which to build; Love Alone is Credible (1965) which represents the pars construens and was written when some volumes of Gloria had already been published; and finally, Epilogue (1987) which provides the final justification for the edifice. The article con-cludes with a presentation of the “insufficient but necessary” apologetics from the first part of the Epilogue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlpha OmeganSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207