MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413302159 · doi:10.1061/9780784479919.020

Design and Construction of Two Concrete Pontoons to Serve as Berths at the Port of Juneau Cruise Ship Terminal

2016· article· en· W2413302159 on OpenAlexaff
Yeliz Firat, R B Easley, Manfred Zinserling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCruisePort (circuit theory)Marine engineeringHullEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two concrete pontoons were designed and constructed to serve as the new berths at the Port of Juneau Cruise Ship Terminal in Alaska. The addition of the concrete pontoons will enable simultaneous berthing of one Panamax-size cruise ship up to 1,000 feet (305 meters) in length and one post-Panamax-size cruise ship up to 1,100 feet (335 meters).The south berth concrete pontoon is 300 feet (91 meters) long and 50 feet (15 meters) wide, while the north berth concrete pontoon is 400 feet (122 meters) long and 50 feet (15 meters) wide. Both pontoons are 20 feet (6 meters) deep. The existence of numerous heavy attachments to hull plating made the design and the construction of the pontoons challenging. This paper is focused on discussing the salient features of the design and construction effort for the concrete pontoons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207