MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413390198 · doi:10.3399/bjgp15x687025

Micro-teams for better continuity in Tower Hamlets: we have a problem but we’re working on a promising solution!

2015· article· en· W2413390198 on OpenAlex
Liliana Risi, Naureen Bhatti, Philippa Cockman, Joe Hall, Emma Ovink, Sean Macklin, George Freeman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of General Practice · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreSt. Stephen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceFeelingTowerMedicineDisadvantageEmergency departmentIvory towerMedical prescriptionNursingPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We want fresh doctors', a Patient Participation Group member requested during an engagement event in Tower Hamlets in 2014.He went on to explain that he no longer wanted to consult doctors who looked tired and distracted.Tower Hamlets is characterised by high social disadvantage.People live with more illness, consult more frequently, and die younger, compared with more affluent areas.The number of patient contacts per GP is very high, resulting in both patients and doctors feeling more stressed after consultations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it