Geophysical investigations at the dorset Palaeoeskimo site of Phillip's Garden, Port au Choix, Northwestern Newfoundland
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis presents geophysical investigations at Phillip's Garden, a large Palaeoeskimo site located near Port au Choix, northwestern Newfoundland. Previous geophysical investigations at the site have focused on large scale magnetometry surveys, aimed at identifying possible buried dwellings at the site. This research expands on this by using two complimentary geophysical methods, magnetometry and ground penetrating radar, and focusing on small scale surveying aimed at identifying features within dwellings. The purposes of this research are testing the efficacy of magnetometry and ground penetrating radar in identifying features within dwellings, testing whether there is a difference between surveying excavated versus unexcavated dwellings, and assessing the best surveying increments for geophysically surveying dwellings at Phillip's Garden. The results of this research suggest that magnetometry and ground penetrating radar are useful in identifying features associated with dwellings at Phillip's Garden, particularly in unexcavated dwellings using a smaller increment between survey transects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it