MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CP-072 Cardiovascular risk associated with the use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cohort study

2016· article· en· W2413485843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
JL Sánchez Serrano, JM Tenias Burillo, MC Conde García, B Proy Vega, MT Gómez Lluch, JC Valenzuela Gámez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute coronary syndromeInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)Retrospective cohort studyRofecoxibRelative riskPoisson regressionPharmacoepidemiologyCohortCohort studyMyocardial infarctionPharmacologyConfidence intervalPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Since the clinical trial VIGOUR, in which the use of rofecoxib was proved to be connected to a larger number of cardiovascular accidents, an increase in cardiovascular diseases connected to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has been observed. Purpose This study intends to evaluate cardiovascular impact related to the use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Material and methods A retrospective observational study of a clinical cohort over 5 years was done in which all patients older than 18 years (n = 116 686) were included. The statistical analysis was done estimating the incidence of acute coronary syndrome in relation to exposure time. The risk associated with the consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was made by Poisson regression adjusting for sex and age. Results The connexion between acute coronary syndrome and the use of anti-inflammatory drugs was positive and significant (RR 3.64; 95% CI 2.94 to 4.52; p < 0.001). The cardiovascular risk was higher for alkanones (RR 18; 95% CI 2.53 to 127; p = 0.004), followed by propionoicos (RR 2.58; 95% CI 2.16 to 3.69; p < 0.001), arylacetic (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.22; p < 0.001) and finally coxib (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.92; p < 0.001); in other anti-inflammatories, no increased cardiovascular risk was observed. Conclusion The use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has been connected to a higher risk of cardiovascular accidents; these drugs must not be consumed for a long time or at high doses. References and/or Acknowledgements García Rodríguez LA, González-Pérez A, et al. NSAID use selectively increases the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. PLoS One 2011;6:e16780 Varas-Lorenzo C, Castellsague J, et al. The use of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and the risk of acute myocardial infarction in Saskatchewan, Canada. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009;18:1016-25 García Rodríguez LA, Tacconelli S, Patrignani P. Role of dose potency in the prediction of risk of myocardial infarction associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;11(52):1628-36 No conflict of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207