MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413620856

Motexafin lutetium (Pharmacyclics).

2001· article· en· W2413620856 on OpenAlexaff
Pollen Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhotodynamic therapyRestenosisRefractory (planetary science)Breast cancerApatinibMacular degenerationSurgeryCancerOncologyInternal medicineOphthalmologyStent
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pharmacyclics is developing the photosensitizer, motexafin lutetium as Antrin for the potential treatment of restenosis and atherosclerotic plaques, Lutrin for the possible treatment of cancer, and Optrin for the possible treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). ANTRIN: A phase II multicenter, randomized, controlled study involving 375 peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients is being conducted in the US. It is designed to evaluate Antrin photoangioplasty as a primary treatment for PAD and for the prevention of restenosis following balloon angioplasty [341341,347151]. LUTRIN: Lutrin is being developed for the possible treatment of a number of cancers [348919]. In July 1997, the compound entered phase II trials for breast cancer [323952,323929]. In August 2000, the compound was undergoing a phase IIb trial for advanced refractory breast cancer [380234]. OPTRIN: In May 2000, Pharmacyclics reported preliminary results from an ongoing phase II dose-ranging study with Optrin for the photodynamic therapy of patients with AMD [365074].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207