MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413752365

[Myocardial infarction with normal or near normal coronary arteries: late outcome of seven patients].

2000· article· en· W2413752365 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Giroux, Sylvie K. Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsCégep de Lévis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionCoronary arteriesAnginaInfarctionUnstable anginaArtery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myocardial infarction with normal or near normal coronary arteries: Late outcome of seven patients Myocardial infarction with normal or near normal coronary arteries probably results from thrombotic occlusion that is followed by lysis and recanalization; in about a third of affected patients, coronary spasm appears to be the trigger. The clinical profile of this syndrome is well known: patients are young and without coronary risk factors except cigarette smoking, and they have no angina before or after their infarction. However, the late prognosis remains controversial. Between December 1976 and April 1984, myocardial infarction with normal or near normal coronary arteries was diagnosed in seven patients who were subsequently followed for a mean of 19 years. Observations during this follow-up show that the majority of patients experienced one or more recurrences that, in three cases, initiated the development of a severe ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207