“La Iglesia es militante” Homenaje a la “Meditation sur l’Eglise” de Henri de Lubac, 60 años después de su publicación
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: The Church is “militant”. This statement of Henri de Lubac, one of the greatest theologians of the twentieth century, is clearly developed in his “Meditation on the Church” (introduction). In this study I want to enter more deeply into this insight of the famous Jesuit theologian, showing how the Church is militant in her origin and in her history (1). She is militant in her purpose (2) and finally, She is militant in her consummation (3). Some images of the Church, taken from the patristic tradition, corroborate this intuition (conclusion). Sommario: La Chiesa e “militante”. Quest’affermazione di Henri de Lubac, uno dei piu grandi teologi del ventesimo secolo, e chiaramente sviluppata nella sua “Meditazione sulla Chiesa” (introduzione). In questo studio voglio approfondire in questa intuizione del famoso teologo gesuita, mostrando come la Chiesa sia militante nella sua origine e nella sua storia (1), militante nel suo compito (2) e finalmente, militante nella sua consumazione (3). Alcune immagini della chiesa, prese dalla tradizione patristica, corroborano questa intuizione (conclusione). Key words: Church, militant Church, Kingdom of God, Kingdom of Christ, Henri de Lubac, Fathers of the Church, Gaudium et Spes, Benedict XVI, Pope Francis. Parole chiave: Chiesa, chiesa militante, Regno di Dio, Regno di Cristo, Henri de Lubac, Padri della Chiesa, Gaudium et Spes, Benedetto XVI, Papa Francesco.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".