MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413868391 · doi:10.1109/tap.2016.2546946

Reply to “Comments on ‘Theoretical Modeling of a Photoconductive Antenna in a Terahertz Pulsed System’”

2016· article· en· W2413868391 on OpenAlexaff
Neda Khiabani, Yi Huang, Yaochun Shen, S. J. Boyes

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationAntenna (radio)PhotoconductivityOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsElectrical engineeringComputer scienceTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents a reply to comments made on the paper, "Theoretical modeling of a photoconductive antenna in a Terahertz Pulsed System" (Prajapti, J., et al), IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2583-2584, 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.075
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0460.039
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207