MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2413882899

PAX3 loads onto pericentromeric heterochromatin during S phase through PARP1.

2014· article· en· W2413882899 on OpenAlexaff
Wu Tf, Yao Yl, I‐Lu Lai, Tsung‐Han Lee, D. Alan Underhill, Wen‐Ming Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterochromatinPAX3BiologyCell biologyMolecular biologyTranscription factorDNAGeneticsChromatinGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Proper re-establishment of heterochromatin after each round of DNA replication is critical to the preservation of cell identity. Paired box 3 (PAX3), a transcription factor important in embryonic development, was found to mediate the formation of pericentromeric heterochromatin. However, how PAX3 recognizes the heterochromatic environment and re-establishes it after DNA replication remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell-cycle synchronization, fluorescence microscopic analyses, and co-immunoprecipitation were used to analyze the heterochromatic localization of PAX3 in HEK 293 cells and NIH 3T3 cells. RESULTS: We found that PAX3 binds pericentromeric heterochromatin during middle-to-late S phase. Loading of PAX3 onto pericentromeric heterochromatin requires poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1). Furthermore, loss of PAX3 or PARP1 delays cell-cycle progression through the S phase. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal how PAX3 recognizes and maintains pericentromeric heterochromatin at the S phase of the cell cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→