MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413990853 · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-519-0_8

Use of Inverse Theory Algorithms in the Analysis of Biomembrane NMR Data

2007· review· en· W2413990853 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Sternin

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoore–Penrose pseudoinverseInverseInverse problemRegularization (linguistics)Experimental dataAlgorithmInverse theoryComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treating the analysis of experimental spectroscopic data as an inverse problem and using regularization techniques to obtain stable pseudoinverse solutions, allows access to previously unavailable level of spectroscopic detail. The data is mapped into an appropriate physically relevant parameter space, leading to better qualitative and quantitative understanding of the underlying physics, and in turn, to better and more detailed models. A brief survey of relevant inverse methods is illustrated by several successful applications to the analysis of nuclear magnetic resonance data, yielding new insight into the structure and dynamics of biomembrane lipids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207