MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414051397 · doi:10.4018/ijssci.2015070102

Multifractal Singularity Spectrum for Cognitive Cyber Defence in Internet Time Series

2015· article· en· W2414051397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsResearch ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyberspaceComputer scienceComputer securityExploitHackerThe InternetCloud computingIntrusion detection systemMalwareWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing global dependence over cyberspace has given rise to intelligent malicious threats due to increasing network complexities, inherent vulnerabilities embedded within the software and the limitations of existing cyber security systems to name a few. Malicious cyber actors exploit these vulnerabilities to carry out financial fraud, steal intellectual property and disrupt the delivery of essential online services. Unlike physical security, cyberspace is very difficult to secure due to the replacement of traditional computing platforms with sophisticated cloud computing and virtualization. These complex systems exhibit an increasing degree of complexity in tracking an attack or monitoring possible threats which is becoming intractable with the existing security firewalls and intrusion detection systems. In this paper, authors present a novel complexity detection technique using generalized multifractal singularity spectrum which is able to not only capture the growing complexity of the internet time series but also distinguishes the presence of an attack accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it