MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414108248 · doi:10.5539/apr.v8n4p1

Dipole Moment and Electronic Structure Calculations of the Electronic States of the molecular ion SiN+

2016· article· en· W2414108248 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karam Hamdan, Ghassan Younes, Mahmoud Korek

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic physicsPhysicsDipoleElectronic structureIonGround stateCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p class="1Body">A theoretical investigation of the lowest electronic states of the molecular ion SiN<sup>+</sup> has been performed via Complete Active Space Self Consistent Field (CASSCF) method with Multi Reference Configuration Interaction MRCI+Q (single and double excitations with Davidson correction) calculations. The potential energy curves of the low-lying 37 electronic states in the representation <sup>2s+1</sup>Λ<sup>(+/-)</sup>, up to 140000 cm<sup>-1 , </sup>have been investigated. The permanent dipole moment, the harmonic frequency ω<sub>e</sub>, the equilibrium internuclear distance R<sub>e</sub>, the rotational constants B<sub>e</sub> and the electronic energy with respect to the ground state T<sub>e</sub> have been calculated for these electronic states. The comparison between the values of the present work and those available in the literature for several electronic states shows a very good agreement. The permanent dipole moment, of the investigated 37 electronic states, have been calculated in the present work for the first time along with the investigation of nine new electronic states that have not been observed yet.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207