MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414226266

Wireless telemetry and Internet technologies for medical management: a Martian analogy.

2001· article· en· W2414226266 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harnett Bm, Charles R. Doarn, Russell Km, Kapoor, Merriam Nr, Merrell Rc

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramVital signsSpacecraftWirelessThe InternetComputer scienceMartianTelemetryNetwork topologySpace suitExploration of MarsTelecommunicationsEngineeringSimulationComputer networkAstrobiologyWorld Wide WebAerospace engineeringMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The NASA Haughton-Mars Project Base Camp on Devon Island, Canada (approximately 75 degrees north) was the site for transmission of vital signs from two "terranauts" (individuals who acted as Earthbound astronauts) back to the United States in (artificially delayed) real-time. METHODS: The subjects became "physiologic ciphers" for status monitoring using readily available technologies that affordably captured and distributed vital signs to a variety of platforms. This study of nominal monitoring and simulated medical emergency used wireless technologies and the Internet. RESULTS: Basic vital signs and images can be sent using wireless topologies and completely automated functions. Due to the lightweight transport requirements, existing low data rate connections can easily handle the volume of traffic. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring, the health of space travelers will be an important component for both low-Earth orbiting spacecraft and long-term missions to distant planets. However, terrestrial applications represent the primary application of such technologies because the home can be a remote and hazardous environment as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207