MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414258824

Expressed sequence tag analysis of zebrafish eye tissues for NEIBank.

2005· article· en· W2414258824 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas S. Vihtelic, James M. Fadool, James Gao, Kimberley A Thornton, David R. Hyde, Graeme Wistow

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishBiologyUniGenecDNA libraryExpressed sequence tagGenBankGeneGeneticsComplementary DNASequence analysisGene expression profilingGene expressionComputational biology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To characterize gene expression patterns in various tissues of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) eye and identify zebrafish orthologs of human genes by expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis for NEIBank. METHODS: mRNA was extracted from adult zebrafish eye tissues, including lenses, anterior segments (minus lens), retinas, posterior segments lacking retinas, and whole eyes. Five different cDNA libraries were constructed in the pCMVSport6 vector. Approximately 4,000 clones from each library were sequenced and analyzed using various bioinformatics programs. RESULTS: The analysis yielded approximately 2,500 different gene clusters for each library. Combining data from the five libraries produced 10,392 unique gene clusters. GenBank accession numbers were identified for 37.6% (3,906) of the total gene clusters in the combined libraries and approximately 50% were linked to Unigene clusters in the current database. Several new crystallin genes, including two gammaN-crystallins, and a second major intrinsic protein (MIP) were identified in the lens library. In addition, a zebrafish homolog of cochlin (COCH), a gene that may play a role in the pathogenesis of human glaucoma, was identified in the anterior segment library. Surprisingly, no clear ortholog of the major retinal transcription factor Nrl was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The zebrafish eye tissue cDNA libraries are a useful resource for comparative gene expression analysis. These libraries will complement the cDNA libraries made for the Zebrafish Gene Collection (ZGC) and provide an additional source for gene identification and characterization in the vertebrate eye.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207