Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommario: La “riforma nella continuita” nell’insegnamento della Chiesa sul valore di san Tommaso come filosofo e, piu in particolare, come guida negli studi filosofici dei candidati al sacerdozio, si coglie: a) nell’identificazione del problema principale, che serve da cornice a tale insegnamento e che rimane nel tempo: il rapporto fede e ragione; b) nello studio degli interventi del Magistero che si sono occupati di san Tommaso filosofo, con particolare attenzione al contesto immediatamente precedente al Concilio Vaticano II; c) nell’interpretazione del testo conciliare che principalmente si e occupato dell’argomento, vale a dire, Optatam totius n. 15; e, finalmente, d) nella ricezione post-conciliare di questo insegnamento. Parole chiave: S. Tommaso d’Aquino, studi filosofici, fede e ragione, magistero ecclesiale, Concilio Vaticano II, formazione dei seminaristi. Abstract: We see the “reform in continuity” in the Church’s teaching on the value of Saint Thomas Aquinas as Philosophy, and, more particularly, as guide in the philosophical studies of candidates to the priesthood, in four ways: a) in the identification of the principal problem that functions as a cornerstone in such teaching and that endures throughout time – the relation between faith and reason; b) in the study of the Magisterium’s interventions regarding Saint Thomas as philosopher, particularly as regards the time immediately before the Second Vatican Council; c) in the interpretation of the Council’s text that deals with the argument – Optatam totius, n. 15; and lastly, d) in the post-conciliar reception of this teaching. Key words: St. Thomas Aquinas, philosophy studies, faith and reason, Church’s Magisterium, Second Vatican Council, formation of seminarians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".