MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414378886 · doi:10.1111/epi.13399

Remote <scp>MEG</scp> dipoles in focal cortical dysplasia at bottom of sulcus

2016· article· en· W2414378886 on OpenAlexafffund
Midori Nakajima, Elysa Widjaja, Shiro Baba, Yosuke Sato, R. Yoshida, Maya Tabei, Ayaka Okazaki, Satoru Sakuma, Stephanie Holowka, Ayako Ochi, O. Carter Snead, James T. Rutka, James M. Drake, Hideaki Shiraishi, Sam M. Doesburg, Hiroshi Otsubo

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityHospital for Sick Children
FundersJapan Epilepsy Research FoundationHokkaido UniversityOntario Brain InstituteEpilepsy Foundation
KeywordsIctalMagnetoencephalographyMagnetic resonance imagingCortical dysplasiaLesionMedicineSulcusNuclear medicineEpilepsyRadiologyAnatomyPathologyElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the magnetoencephalography (MEG) single moving dipole (SMD) method could delineate the epileptic zone of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) at the bottom of sulcus (FCDB). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 17 children (11 male; mean age 8.8 years, range 3-17 years) with FCD type II who underwent epilepsy surgery. We compared spatial congruence between the following: (1) MEG cluster and FCDB and (2) MEG cluster and FCD at the brain surface (FCDS). We measured the volume and depth of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible lesions to investigate whether they affect spatial congruence between MEG cluster and MRI-visible lesion. RESULTS: Eight children had FCDB and the other nine children had FCDS. The volume of MRI-visible lesions for FCDB ranged from 1,632 to 4,707 mm(3) (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 3,095 ± 1,211 mm(3) ). The depth of FCDB ranged from 19 to 33 mm (mean ± SD 26 ± 4 mm). The volume of MRI-visible lesion for FCDS ranged from 2,375 to 57,331 mm(3) (15,470 ± 18,455 mm(3) ). There was a tendency for a smaller volume of MRI-visible lesion for FCDB, relative to FCDS(p = 0.079). In FCDB, six children showed clusters of MEG dipoles and two children showed scattered MEG dipoles for interictal spikes. The spatial congruence between the MEG result and FCDB was partially overlapping in four children and discordant in another four children. In FCDS, eight children had MEG cluster and one child had MEG scatter alone. The spatial congruence between MEG result and FCDS was overlapping in eight of nine children (fully two; partially six) and discordant in one of nine children. Fifteen children (88%; FCDB eight; FCDS seven) became seizure-free after resective surgery. MEG spike dipole resection ratio in the cluster ranged from 4-100% (mean 67%) in 6 FCDB and 23-99% (mean 77%) in 8 FCDS. SIGNIFICANCE: The SMD method may drift MEG spike dipoles for FCDB. Lesionectomy can control seizures for four of eight patients in FCDB despite the remote MEG dipoles. The FCDB or FCDS partially overlapped with MEG cluster may have an extending/invisible epileptogenic zone consecutive to the MRI-visible lesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207