Social competence in pediatric brain tumor survivors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to review the literature in the area of social competence in pediatric brain tumor survivors published in the last year. RECENT FINDINGS: Research published over the past year examining the social competence of pediatric brain tumor survivors has seen the consistent application of a comprehensive conceptual framework that pertains specifically to children with brain disorders. Subsequent to the application of a comprehensive conceptual framework, more sophisticated research approaches have begun to advance our understanding of deficits among this population. Specifically, operationalization of social competence is evolving. SUMMARY: Continued application of a conceptual framework and investigation into the components that comprise the framework will enhance the depth of our understanding of social competence deficits among this population. Research must continue to use innovative approaches to measuring social competence. Considerable gaps still exist with respect to identifying risk and resilience factors for social competence deficits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it