MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414553503

Septal ethanol ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: early and intermediate results of a Canadian referral centre.

2003· article· en· W2414553503 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rohan Bhagwandeen, Wigle Ed, Harry Rakowski, Jennifer Kwinter, Eriksson Mj, L Schwartz

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAlcohol septal ablationVentricular outflow tractCardiologyInterventricular septumObstructive cardiomyopathyAsymptomaticInternal medicineInterventional cardiologyVentricular outflow tract obstructionHeart septumSurgeryHypertrophic cardiomyopathyVentricle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Septal ethanol ablation (SEA) is a relatively new interventional nonsurgical treatment for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). This procedure involves targeted infarction of the basal interventricular septum to reduce left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. OBJECTIVES: To describe the experience with this technique in a large tertiary care centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: Since 1998, 40 HOCM patients with disabling symptoms refractory to medical treatment have undergone SEA. Procedural success was 88% (35 of 40 patients). The LVOT gradient decreased from 86+/-38 mmHg to 16+/-16 mmHg. There were two major complications: one patient died of respiratory failure at 30 days following SEA, and one patient developed a major coronary dissection during the procedure and required emergency myectomy and coronary bypass surgery. There were two late failures (6% of initially successful cases). In both patients, the LVOT gradient and symptoms reappeared some months after the procedure and further interventions were required. In the remaining patients, the gradient continued to decrease to one year; 86% were asymptomatic or have mild symptoms compared with 94% with severe symptoms before SEA. Septal thickness decreased from 20.8+/-2.9 mm to 13.2+/-3.3 mm (P<0.001) at the site of the targeted septal infarct. CONCLUSION: SEA is a feasible option for suitable patients with HOCM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207