MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2414598909

[A case of repeated intracerebral hemorrhage due to a ruptured aneurysm of collateral circulation from the posterior cerebral artery to the middle cerebral artery].

2009· article· ja· W2414598909 on OpenAlexaff
Ryuta Saito, Kenichi Sato, Hidenori Endo, Nobuo Noshita, Uichi Kaneko

Bibliographic record

Venue电力系统自动化 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMiddle cerebral arteryAneurysmAnterior cerebral arteryCollateral circulationCerebral arteriesHematomaPosterior cerebral arteryAnterior communicating arteryPerforating arteriesSubarachnoid hemorrhageIntracerebral hemorrhageRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicineIschemia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a case of ruptured distal middle cerebral artery aneurysm associated with occlusion of the anterior trunk of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. An 83-year-old man had right homonymous hemianopsia and right mild hemiparesis. CT scan revealed hematoma and a perifocal low density area at the left occipital subcortex without subarchnoid hemorrhage (SAH). MRI showed repeated bleeding at the same location as the CT scan. Moreover, cerebral angiograms disclosed an aneurysm on the leptomeningeal anastomosis from the left posterior cerebral artery to the middle cerebral artery. The anterior trunk of the left middle cerebral artery was occluded at the origin. The aneurysm was not situated at the bifurcation and was trapped without new neurological complications. This case suggested that hemodynamic stress due to occlusion of the main artery contributed to the development of an aneurysm at the collateral artery. Even if intraparenchymal hematoma presents without SAH, and even if it is located at a rare site for aneurysms, we should inspect the source of bleeding considering factors preventing SAH arising from aneurysms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue电力系统自动化→Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→