Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been a significant increase in the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) in the past several years, including outbreaks in multiple states and provinces in the United States and Canada, as well as in the United Kingdom. A new, highly virulent strain of C. difficile has appeared that is less responsive to standard therapy and associated with a high rate of recurrence. Along with nosocomially acquired infections there has been a rise in the number of community-acquired cases of CDAD, even among those without prior antibiotic exposure. Many factors have contributed to this epidemic, including the development of resistance to the widely used fluoroquinolones class of antibiotics. Because this new strain is less responsive to standard therapy, particularly metronidazole, a number of new antibiotics and other therapies are actively being investigated for use in both primary and recurrent CDAD. A multifaceted approach to managing CDAD is called for, including active surveillance, antibiotic stewardship, and meticulous attention to contact precautions, including gloves, gowns, and hand washing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".