Full-Space Electronic Beam-Steering Transmitarray With Integrated Leaky-Wave Feed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new low-profile, full-space, electronic beam-steering antenna architecture which combines the full-space beam-steering properties of reconfigurable transmitarrays with the low-profile feeding characteristics of leaky-wave antennas is proposed. The design uses an integrated leaky-wave feed to spatially distribute power across a reconfigurable transmitarray aperture in a low-profile manner while individual element phase control using varactor diodes enables full-space pencil-beam-steering. A $6\times 6$ element array was fabricated and experimentally verified, and full-space (both azimuth and elevation) beam-steering was demonstrated at angles up to 45° off broadside with a total efficiency for all scan angles on the order of 25%-35%. The design demonstrates a tenfold reduction in the overall thickness over the original transmitarray, improved aperture amplitude distribution control, as well as improved spillover control. The design also acts as a lower cost, scalable alternative to phased arrays as it does not require a complicated beamforming network and the feed and aperture are easily scaled.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".