MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414681172 · doi:10.26418/lantang.v1i1.18811

ARSITEKTUR TRADISIONAL TIONGHOA: TINJAUAN TERHADAP IDENTITAS, KARAKTER BUDAYA DAN EKSISTENSINYA

2014· article· id· W2414681172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLANGKAU BETANG JURNAL ARSITEKTUR · 2014
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Budaya merupakan sebuah proses perkembangan pola pikir yang terjadi secara bertahap dalam waktu yang lama. Proses ini terjadi selama manusia ada dan terus berkembang sesuai dengan pengembangan wawasan keilmuan. Setting lingkungan merupakan salah satu faktor yang berperan kuat dalam pembentukan karakter budaya. Tionghoa merupakan etnis yang banyak melakukan perpindahan ke daerah lain termasuk diantaranya daerah barat dan asia, baik dengan hubungan perdagangan maupun ekspedisi. Saat ini, banyak ditemukan daerah Permukiman Tionghoa di beberapa tempat, sebut saja Pecinan atau China town. Namun yang menarik adalah perbedaan tempat dan lingkungan tersebut tidak membuat eksistensi Budaya Tionghoa memudar. Dari sekian banyak karakter budaya Tionghoa, yang paling menonjol adalah bentuk arsitekturnya. Hal ini terjadi karena bentuk budaya yang paling mudah dilihat adalah bentuk fisiknya dalam hal ini arsitektur bangunannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi bagaimana Budaya Tionghoa dapat bertahan dengan eksistensi nilai arsitektur bangunannya. Pemahaman terhadap karakteristik Arsitektur Tionghoa menjadi sangat penting dalam memahami perkembangan budayanya. Penelitian ini dibatasi pada ruang lingkup arsitektur tradisional. Pemilihan wilayah studi juga berkaitan dengan perbandingan Arsitektur Tionghoa pada budaya barat dan timur. Interpretasi deskriptif berdasarkan persamaan dan perbedaan arsitektur bangunan akan menjelaskan bagaimana Etnis Tionghoa mampu meminimalisir pengaruh budaya lain terhadap karakter arsitekturnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukan identitas arsitektur tradisional Tionghoa terbentuk dengan konsistensi terhadap nilai kepercayaanya. Sementara kepercayaan adalah landasan utama yang membentuk Kebudayaan Tionghoa. Oleh karena itu, refleksi eksistensi Budaya Tionghoa akan berimplikasi terhadap eksistensi identitas arsitekturnya Culture is a process of mindset development that occur gradually over a long time. This process occurs during human life on earth and continue to evolve in accordance with the development of scientific knowledge. The environment setting is one of the factors that play a strong role in shaping the cultural character. Chinese is ethnic which has a lot of migration to other areas such as western and asian regions, either by trading or expedition. Currently, many Chinese settlement areas are found in several places, called Pechinan or China town. The interesting one is the difference of environment where they live does not make the existence of their culture are fade. From several characters of Chinese culture, the most prominent is the architecture. This happens because of cultural forms is most easily seen in form of physical or architecture of the building. This study aims to identify how the Chinese culture can survive with the existence of architectural value. Understanding about Chinese architecture characteristic is very important to understand the development of the culture. This study limited only to the scope of traditional architecture. The selection of study area is also related to the comparation of Chinese architecture in western and eastern culture. Descriptive interpretation based on similarities and differences in the architecture of the building were able to explained how the Chinese ethnic minimize other cultural influences on the character of the architecture. The results showed that the traditional Chinese architectural identity is formed by the consistency of the religious value. While religion is the major base in the Chinese cultural forming. Therefore, the reflection of existence of Chinese culture have implications for the existence of their architectural identityREFERENCESBanks, J.A., Banks, McGee, C. A. 1989. Multicultural education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn Bacon.Carey, Peter. 1985. Masyarakat Jawa dan Masyarakat China. Jakarta: Pustaka AzetCatanese, A. J. Snyder, J. C. (1991). Pengantar Arsitektur. Jakarta: Penerbit ErlanggaChen, Joyce. 2011. Chinese Immigration to the United States:History, Selectivity and Human Capital. The Ohio State University.Damen, L. 1987. Culture Learning: The Fifth Dimension on the Language Classroom. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.García. J. F. Culture. Ashland University, Ohio. http://personal.ashland.edu/jgarcia/culture1.html, didownload pada 15 okteober 2011.Guo, Shibao Don J. DeVoretz. 2006. Chinese Immigrants in Vancouver: Quo Vadis? Discussion Paper No. 2340. Simon Fraser University. Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6. CanadaHandinoto. 2008. Perkembangan Bangunan Etnis Tionghoa di Indonesia (Akhir Abad ke 19 sampai tahun 1960-an). (Prosiding Simposium Nasional Arsitektur Vernakular 2. Petra Christian University "“ SurabayaKhol, David G. 1984. Chinese Architecture in The Straits Settlements and Western Malaya: Temples Kongsis and Houses, Heineman Asia, Kuala Lumpur. Archipel. Volume 33, 1987. p. 185Kupier, Kathleem. 2011. The Culture Of Tionghoa. Britannica Educational Publishing. New YorkMaspero, Henri. Translated by Frank A. Kierman, Jr. 1981. Taoism and Chinese Religion. University of MassachusettsO"™Gorman, J. F. 1997. ABC of Architecture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressPratiwo. 2010. Arsitektur Tradisional Tionghoa dan Perkembangan Kota. Penerbit Ombak. YogyakartaRummens, Joanna. 2001. An Interdisciplinary Overview of canadian Research on Identity. Department of Canadian Heritage for the Ethnocultural, Racial, Religious, and Linguistic Diversity and Identity Seminar Halifax, Nova ScotiaSalem, MA. A Teacher"™s Sourcebook for Chinese Art Culture. Peabody Essex Museum.Guo, Shibao and Don J. DeVoretz. 2006. Chinese Immigrants in Vancouver:Quo Vadis? IZA Discussion Paper. GermanyTaylor, Rodney L. 1982. "Proposition and Praxis: The Dilemma of Neo-Confucian Syncretism". Philosophy of East and West, Vol. 32, No. 2 pg. 187Wade, Geoff. 2007. The "Liu/Menzies"World Map: A Critique. e-Perimetron, Vol. 2, No. 4, Autumn 2007 [273-280]Widayati, Naniek. 2004. Telaah Arsitektur Berlanggam China di Jalan Pejagalan Raya Nomor 62 Jakarta Barat. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur Vol. 32, No. 1, Juli 2004: 42 - 56Wigglesworth, S. Till, J. 1998. The Everyday and Architecture. Architectural Design. New York: Princeton Architectural PressWong, Bernard. 1998. Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship: The New Chinese Immigrants in the San Francisco Bay Area. Allyn Bacon A Simon Schuster Company. San Francisco State University. United States of America

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it