MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415023907 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2016.0318

On the capacity and energy efficiency of non‐coherent Rayleigh fading channels with additive Gaussian mixture noise

2016· article· en· W2415023907 on OpenAlexaff
Duc‐Anh Le, Hung V. Vu, Mohammad Ranjbar, Nghi H. Tran, Tutku Karacolak, Tiep M. Hoang

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRayleigh fadingUpper and lower boundsSpectral efficiencyTransmitterChannel capacityChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)FadingAdditive white Gaussian noiseGaussianComputer scienceEfficient energy useTopology (electrical circuits)Energy (signal processing)MathematicsTelecommunicationsWirelessPhysicsStatisticsMathematical analysisElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the capacity and energy efficiency of non‐coherent Rayleigh fading channels with Gaussian mixture noise where neither the transmitter nor the receiver has the knowledge of channel state information. The channel under consideration is suited for cellular networks having multi‐tier heterogeneous architectures in which the channel conditions change rapidly. In the first part of the paper, we characterize the structure of a capacity‐achieving input signal. Specifically, we establish an integrable upper bound on the integrand in the output entropy and demonstrate that there exists a unique optimal input. By formulating the Kuhn‐Tucker condition and establishing a diverging lower bound on it, we show that the optimal input is discrete having a finite number of mass points. Using this result, we investigate the capacity and energy efficiency of the considered channel in the second part of the paper. In particular, we first develop a numerical method to evaluate the optimal input and compute the capacity. The energy efficiency, which is related to the capacity and optimal input in low‐power regimes, is examined by calculating the minimum bit energy and wideband slope of the spectral‐efficiency curve. We also analytically show the optimality of an on‐off signal in this regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207